Skip to main content

Texas Republicans must extend health care for new mothers after abortion ban

Austin American-Statesman
Republican lawmakers who voted to ban abortion in Texas say they’re committed to protecting the health of pregnant women who are now forced to bear children under the state’s extreme and punitive new law.

Count us skeptical, considering that Texas suffers persistently dismal health outcomes for women and children after two full decades of Republican control of the legislature and governor’s office. However, if Gov. Greg Abbott and his abortion-banning allies in the House and Senate truly want to demonstrate that their concern for women is real, they’ll get a chance when the Legislature convenes early next year.

That’s when a federal COVID-related public health emergency that enables low-income women in all 50 states to receive a full year of postpartum care under Medicaid is likely to expire, although it could lapse even sooner. Unless the Texas Legislature acts as soon as possible, some Texas women would see their access to postnatal care cut off after just two, or in the best case scenario, six months. It’s outrageous, but hardly unthinkable, that Texas would force pregnant women to give birth, then refuse to pay for their health care.

Regular health checkups for new moms can detect complications that arise from childbirth, and help prevent serious medical conditions from spiraling out of control. Studies show that low-income mothers are especially susceptible to pregnancy-induced hypertension, hemorrhage and infection. Sadly, the problem is especially acute in Texas, which has the seventh-worst maternal death rate in the nation. That pitiful statistic is inexcusable in a state with a $27 billion budget surplus.

Many health experts expect the Biden administration to extend the federal emergency declaration providing for a year of postpartum care as soon as next week, but it will eventually end, most likely by January. That’s when Texas lawmakers will reconvene in Austin for the 88th Legislature. It’s an opportunity for the Legislature to fix its failure in 2021 to provide adequate postpartum health care and prevent potentially deadly repercussions for new mothers.

A bill that Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law in 2021 only met half of the federal government’s offer to extend health care to poor women after the birth of their children. The Texas House that year approved a full year of care recommended by health experts and the federal government, but the Senate voted to extend it for only six months. The House grudgingly agreed and sent the bill to Abbott. Now, the Department of Health and Human Services is balking at Texas’ extension request because of language in the application that could be interpreted to exclude pregnant women who have abortions, including medically necessary abortions.

Never missing an opportunity to score political points, Abbott accused the Biden administration of “robbing mothers of services” by raising red flags about Texas’ application. The governor’s criticism was all politics, silent on the fact that the Biden administration had offered states a chance to expand postpartum Medicaid coverage to a full year. Had Texas enrolled in the 12-month coverage, as it should have, its application would have sailed through and additional health care would be available for an untold number of mothers who will be forced to carry a fetus to term if they don’t notice that they are pregnant within six weeks of conception.

Whoever wins the Texas governor’s race in November – Abbott or his Democratic challenger Beto O’Rourke – must call on the Texas Legislature to authorize a new application to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to extend postpartum health care coverage to Texas women. At least 33 states have already done so.

Rep. Donna Howard, an Austin Democrat who chairs the Texas Women’s Health Caucus, told our editorial board that her Republican colleagues should, at the first opportunity, pass legislation authorizing an application to extend the postpartum care for women for a full year.

“If you’re really prolife, and you’re wanting all these moms to have babies, let’s make sure that they’re healthy and safe, and that they continue to be healthy after they have this baby so they can take care of them,” Howard said.

If Texas lawmakers are going to force poor pregnant women to bear children, no matter their health status, the least they can do is have the state pick up the tab for their medical care. When Texas mothers are left without resources to protect their health, we all lose. It hurts children, employers, taxpayers and entire communities.

Abbott and Texas Republican lawmakers callously stripped pregnant women of the right to choose an abortion. Now, they must step up and help the most vulnerable new mothers stay healthy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russia issues stark warning over the nuclear power plant it's occupying; Kyiv urges inspection of damaged facility

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Wednesday night that Ukrainian diplomats and nuclear scientists are in "constant touch" with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and working to get a team of inspectors into the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. The plant has been occupied by Russian troops since the start of the war in Ukraine but there have been increasing fears that a nuclear catastrophe could take place as shelling has intensified around the plant, which Ukraine says has been used by Russia to store ammunition and military equipment. Russia has accused Ukraine of shelling the plant. There are heightened fears that a catastrophe could occur at the plant, which is Europe's largest of its kind. Yesterday, Ukraine's Emergency Ministry conducted a nuclear catastrophe exercise in Zaporizhzhia in case of an accident.  In other news, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres is in Lviv in Ukraine on Thursday to

Now Microsoft injects Copilot AI into Dynamics 365

Bringing Embrace, Extend, Extinguish to a business workforce near you.  Microsoft has dosed its Dynamics 365 business apps with "AI capabilities" to help human workers delegate tedious tasks to machines. Redmond's automation tools come in a preview form in a release called Dynamics 365 Copilot, a nod to the success of its GitHub subsidiary's controversial Copilot assistive code service. Microsoft sees automated content creation and algorithmically-driven behavior as a way to help employees using customer relationship management (CRM) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems avoid rote work. "Copilot brings the power of next-generation AI capabilities and natural language processing to Dynamics 365, working alongside business professionals to help them create ideas and content faster, complete time-consuming tasks, and get insights and next best actions – just by describing what’s needed," explained Emily He, corporate VP of business applica

This Nigerian is creating software to help the world understand babies’ cries

                              Charles Onu Source: TechCabal When life gives you lemons, you can do whatever you want with them. Problems, on the other hand, require solutions that come from deep thinking and, sometimes, experience. For Canada-based Charles Onu, the problems he experienced in Nigeria formed the womb that would later produce Ubenwa, his innovative healthtech startup that leverages advanced technology to preserve the lives of newborns. In most parts of the world, immediately after a child is born, it undergoes a test called APGAR scoring. This test is a non-invasive examination of the baby that helps to identify whether the child has a medical condition to be treated. At that stage of the baby’s life, though, almost every illness can fall under the life-threatening category, which is why early diagnoses are imperative.  Regrettably, APGAR scoring is a lagging indicator ( a method that diagnoses some medical conditions after they’ve progressed to an extent). It