Skip to main content

Texas Republicans must extend health care for new mothers after abortion ban

Austin American-Statesman
Republican lawmakers who voted to ban abortion in Texas say they’re committed to protecting the health of pregnant women who are now forced to bear children under the state’s extreme and punitive new law.

Count us skeptical, considering that Texas suffers persistently dismal health outcomes for women and children after two full decades of Republican control of the legislature and governor’s office. However, if Gov. Greg Abbott and his abortion-banning allies in the House and Senate truly want to demonstrate that their concern for women is real, they’ll get a chance when the Legislature convenes early next year.

That’s when a federal COVID-related public health emergency that enables low-income women in all 50 states to receive a full year of postpartum care under Medicaid is likely to expire, although it could lapse even sooner. Unless the Texas Legislature acts as soon as possible, some Texas women would see their access to postnatal care cut off after just two, or in the best case scenario, six months. It’s outrageous, but hardly unthinkable, that Texas would force pregnant women to give birth, then refuse to pay for their health care.

Regular health checkups for new moms can detect complications that arise from childbirth, and help prevent serious medical conditions from spiraling out of control. Studies show that low-income mothers are especially susceptible to pregnancy-induced hypertension, hemorrhage and infection. Sadly, the problem is especially acute in Texas, which has the seventh-worst maternal death rate in the nation. That pitiful statistic is inexcusable in a state with a $27 billion budget surplus.

Many health experts expect the Biden administration to extend the federal emergency declaration providing for a year of postpartum care as soon as next week, but it will eventually end, most likely by January. That’s when Texas lawmakers will reconvene in Austin for the 88th Legislature. It’s an opportunity for the Legislature to fix its failure in 2021 to provide adequate postpartum health care and prevent potentially deadly repercussions for new mothers.

A bill that Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law in 2021 only met half of the federal government’s offer to extend health care to poor women after the birth of their children. The Texas House that year approved a full year of care recommended by health experts and the federal government, but the Senate voted to extend it for only six months. The House grudgingly agreed and sent the bill to Abbott. Now, the Department of Health and Human Services is balking at Texas’ extension request because of language in the application that could be interpreted to exclude pregnant women who have abortions, including medically necessary abortions.

Never missing an opportunity to score political points, Abbott accused the Biden administration of “robbing mothers of services” by raising red flags about Texas’ application. The governor’s criticism was all politics, silent on the fact that the Biden administration had offered states a chance to expand postpartum Medicaid coverage to a full year. Had Texas enrolled in the 12-month coverage, as it should have, its application would have sailed through and additional health care would be available for an untold number of mothers who will be forced to carry a fetus to term if they don’t notice that they are pregnant within six weeks of conception.

Whoever wins the Texas governor’s race in November – Abbott or his Democratic challenger Beto O’Rourke – must call on the Texas Legislature to authorize a new application to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to extend postpartum health care coverage to Texas women. At least 33 states have already done so.

Rep. Donna Howard, an Austin Democrat who chairs the Texas Women’s Health Caucus, told our editorial board that her Republican colleagues should, at the first opportunity, pass legislation authorizing an application to extend the postpartum care for women for a full year.

“If you’re really prolife, and you’re wanting all these moms to have babies, let’s make sure that they’re healthy and safe, and that they continue to be healthy after they have this baby so they can take care of them,” Howard said.

If Texas lawmakers are going to force poor pregnant women to bear children, no matter their health status, the least they can do is have the state pick up the tab for their medical care. When Texas mothers are left without resources to protect their health, we all lose. It hurts children, employers, taxpayers and entire communities.

Abbott and Texas Republican lawmakers callously stripped pregnant women of the right to choose an abortion. Now, they must step up and help the most vulnerable new mothers stay healthy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Government to take greater control of Liverpool city council

Intervention expanded to include financial decisions and governance after report calls for urgent reform.  The government’s intervention in the running of Liverpool city council is to be expanded to include governance and financial decision-making. It comes after the publication of another critical report on the local authority by four commissioners appointed last year to work with the council staff in key areas after an inspection. The report, published on Friday and addressed to the communities secretary, Greg Clark, said certain services were “failing” and in need of “urgent reform”. It warns that poor performance in procurement, finance and auditing are limiting the “council’s ability to operate at a crucial time” and called for an added role of “finance commissioner”.  It comes after a report in June revealed that Liverpool city council’s failure to renew contracts across a number of services could cost it millions. Clark, in a letter to the commissioners, rai...

Elon Musk subpoenas former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in takeover dispute

Elon Musk has subpoenaed his friend and former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey as part of an effort to back out of his $44bn agreement to acquire the social media platform. The subpoena was revealed in a court document on Monday. Musk and Twitter are embroiled in a legal battle after the billionaire businessman offered to buy the company – then tried to back out, claiming that Twitter had failed to provide adequate information about the number of fake, or “spam bot”, accounts on the platform. Twitter argues that Musk’s reasons for backing out are just a cover for buyer’s remorse.  Twitter and Musk are headed for a 17 October trial in Delaware that should determine whether or not the company can force him to go through with the acquisition. In recent weeks, Twitter has subpoenaed a host of tech investors and entrepreneurs connected to Musk, including the prominent venture capitalist Marc Andreessen and David Sacks, the founding chief operating officer of PayPal.  Bot and sp...

Desperate’ UK councils hiring out more parks to festivals, warns expert

Surge in festivals after Covid lull risks making green spaces elitist as councils try to offset tightened budgets Cash-strapped councils are increasingly hiring out their green spaces to festivals, an expert has warned, blocking them off from residents for weeks at a time, damaging grass and causing congestion. Councils were “more desperate than ever” to attract commercial income to supplement their reduced budgets after a pandemic hiatus, risking making public parks “more exclusive and more elitist” in the process. Community groups have raised concerns about lack of access for local people during the recent unprecedented heatwave and the school holidays. Andrew Smith, professor of urban experiences at the University of Westminster, said there now seemed to be more festivals in some parts of the country than before the pandemic. A big factor driving this, he said, was that festival organisers were trying to make up for the financial shortfalls of 2020 and 2021, while local ...